Marks
Overall
| pseudonym | hw1 | hw2 | hw3 | midterm | final exam | total | rounded |
| powerplant | 90% | 95% | 90% | 67% | 85% | 89% | 9 |
| Zenin | 100% | 45% | 95% | 29% | 53% | 64% | 6.5 |
| I am 3d | 100% | 88% | 70% | 83% | 74% | 78% | 8 |
| Paratrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 82% | 91% | 9 | |
| NURBS? | 100% | 95% | 100% | 79% | 100% | 99% | 10 |
| muffin | 100% | 93% | 100% | 49% | 5 | ||
| tacomonster | 100% | 95% | 100% | 75% | 87% | 8.5 | |
| sweet potato | 100% | 88% | 85% | 78% | 83% | 8.5 | |
| aafat | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 90% | 95% | 9.5 |
| Marcel-Purcel | 100% | 90% | 100% | 98% | 97% | 9.5 | |
| awawa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | 77% | 88% | 9 |
| Mark | 100% | 88% | 85% | 75% | 80% | 85% | 8.5 |
| Brim | 100% | 95% | 100% | 70% | 84% | 8.5 | |
| ??? | 100% | 45% | 98% | 68% | 7 | ||
| 666B6E617574697374 | 80% | 93% | 100% | 63% | 78% | 8 | |
| ??? | 100% | 100% | 100% | 52% | 88% | 94% | 9.5 |
| stinger | 100% | 100% | 100% | 75% | 98% | 99% | 10 |
| polarbear | 70% | 95% | 90% | 46% | 53% | 70% | 7 |
| mypseudonym | 100% | 88% | 70% | 90% | 87% | 8.5 | |
| zoo | 100% | 93% | 100% | 50% | 68% | 82% | 8 |
| obroni | 90% | 95% | 100% | 48% | 5 | ||
| Blueprint | 100% | 95% | 90% | 60% | 75% | 85% | 8.5 |
| Goose17 | 100% | 95% | 100% | 92% | 80% | 89% | 9 |
| ??? | 100% | 60% | 85% | 88% | 83% | 8.5 | |
| Karim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 78% | 89% | 9 | |
| 5591407 | 100% | 95% | 90% | 81% | 84% | 89% | 9 |
| Azem | 100% | 90% | 100% | 83% | 89% | 9 | |
| i_am_groot | 80% | 18% | 17% | 1.5 | |||
| ??? | 100% | 60% | 85% | 79% | 78% | 8 | |
| avg | 97% | 88% | 94% | 69% | 78% | 80% | 8.10 |
| median | 100% | 95% | 100% | 75% | 80% | 85% | 8.50 |
Homework 1
| pseudonym 1 | pseudonym 2 | code runs (2) | output (4) | report (4) | penalties | total | notes |
| I am 3d | mypseudonym | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Nice analysis with identification of interesting cases | |
| Mark | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Interesting discussion, figures to illustrate cases would have been nice | ||
| ??? | ??? | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Other tile has interesting cases that could have been discussed | |
| Blueprint | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Interesting cases in other tile, would have been nice to discuss more | ||
| Marcel-Purcel | Azem | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Nice sketch of method. Testing was lacking a bit. | |
| powerplant | 2 | 4 | 3 | 90% | Something weird is happening with the expansion values | ||
| Goose17 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Nice comparisons with different parameters, but testing was a bit limited. Descriptions of all parts of report not super clear. | ||
| sweet potato | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Excellent plots and analysis with highlights | ||
| ??? | Zenin | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Minimal metrics | |
| stinger | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Clean report. I like the focus on important parts. | ||
| ??? | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Okay overall, but better to focus more on results/analysis. | ||
| Brim | tacomonster | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Nice description of method, would have been nice to link analysis to specific examples from cases shown | |
| Paratrus | awawa | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Nice results grid and metrics for analysis | |
| NURBS? | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Very nice pseudocode description, well-chosen cases for analysis with figures | ||
| aafat | Karim | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Very clear description, nice plots and analysis | |
| 5591407 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Nicely identified cases. Have a look at the image export of Meshlab (clearer). | ||
| zoo | muffin | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | Okay report. Better to focus more on results with a deeper analysis. | |
| obroni | 2 | 4 | 4 | -1 | 90% | Nice analysis and figures. Wrong student number? 1 day late | |
| polarbear | 2 | 4 | 2 | -1 | 70% | Okay description but minimal results and basically no analysis. 1 day late | |
| 666B6E617574697374 | 2 | 4 | 4 | -2 | 80% | Nicely rendered figures and table of issues but no parameters changed. 2 days late | |
| i_am_groot | 2 | 4 | 4 | -2 | 80% | Good overall but quantitative analysis missing a bit. 2 days late | |
| avg | 2.00 | 4.00 | 3.86 | 96% | |||
| median | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 100% |
Homework 2
| Team # | pseudonym 1 | pseudonym 2 | pseudonym 3 | total |
| 1 | powerplant | polarbear | 95% | |
| 2 | sweet potato | Mark | 88% | |
| 3 | ??? | Zenin | 45% | |
| 4 | Marcel-Purcel | Azem | 90% | |
| 5 | ??? | ??? | 60% | |
| 6 | Goose17 | obroni | NURBS? | 95% |
| 7 | Blueprint | 5591407 | 95% | |
| 8 | stinger | awawa | ??? | 100% |
| 9 | I am 3d | mypseudonym | 88% | |
| 10 | zoo | muffin | 666B6E617574697374 | 93% |
| 11 | tacomonster | Brim | 95% | |
| 12 | Paratrus | aafat | Karim | 100% |
| avg | 87% | |||
| median | 94% |
Homework 3
| team | pseudonym 1 | pseudonym 2 | pseudonym 3 | followed all rules (1) | quality of results (5) | quality of report (4) | penalties | total | notes |
| 1 | sweet potato | Mark | 1 | 4.5 | 3 | 85% | Mostly good result including a dual contouring implementation and detailed analysis, connectivity as described isn’t correct, too many rooms, no validation | ||
| 2 | ??? | ??? | 1 | 4.5 | 3 | 85% | Pretty good results for all 3 models with interesting discussion. Different parameters were tried but one good solution wasn’t clearly identified. Validated all models with process fully explained. Analysis a bit shallow but good overall. | ||
| 3 | stinger | awawa | ??? | 1 | 5 | 4 | 100% | Excellent result and detailed report covering all aspects. Different models and different parameters were tested and validated. All important issues identified. Detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis. | |
| 4 | Marcel-Purcel | Azem | 1 | 5 | 4 | 100% | Very nice results at different resolutions. Many important issues and technical details discussed. Models provided and validated. Cool 2D section viewer for debugging. Semantics for rooms are incorrect (uses exterior surface semantics). | ||
| 5 | I am 3d | mypseudonym | 1 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 70% | Report suggests that full process didn’t work but it does? Not really clear about the do_intersect issue. Only one room in cityjson. Limited analysis. | ||
| 6 | zoo | muffin | 666B6E617574697374 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 100% | Very nice results accompanied with thorough quantitative analysis. Love the different plots and the analysis of the leakage issue. Validation would have been nice, but there’s extensive testing. | |
| 7 | Paratrus | aafat | Karim | 1 | 5 | 4 | 100% | Beautiful cover. Good technical description of issues and parameters. Python room analyser. Great filter for rooms. Storeys computed. Most creative solution in the group :-). | |
| 8 | powerplant | polarbear | 1 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 90% | Good, complete methodology with exploration of alternatives for final surfaces. High quality result but with rooms in incorrect place in hierarchy. Limited validation. | ||
| 9 | 5591407 | Blueprint | 1 | 5 | 3 | 90% | Pretty good results with several models tested. A higher level overview would have been nice for the report. Analysis could have gone deeper. | ||
| 10 | Goose17 | NURBS? | obroni | 1 | 5 | 4 | 100% | Excellent results with several surface extraction methods tested. Complete validation. Thoughtful and actually funny report. Great figures. | |
| 11 | Brim | tacomonster | 1 | 5 | 4 | 100% | Very impressive to have a pipeline that works across so many models. Insightful discussion about connectivity in algorithm. Just missed more info about validation. | ||
| 12 | Zenin | 1 | 5 | 3.5 | 95% | Excellent result with detailed report. Complete validation. Analysis missing a bit but very good description of limitations. | |||
| avg | 1.00 | 4.75 | 3.54 | 93% | |||||
| median | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.75 | 98% |
Midterm
| pseudonym | 1.1 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 4.1 | total | total (%) |
| ? | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 3.25 | 54% |
| stinger | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 4.50 | 75% |
| NURBS? | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 4.75 | 79% |
| ? | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 4.25 | 71% |
| zoo | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50% |
| Goose17 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 5.50 | 92% |
| polarbear | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 46% |
| ? | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 38% |
| Mark | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 4.50 | 75% |
| Zenin | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 29% |
| Blueprint | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 3.63 | 60% |
| I am 3d | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 83% |
| powerplant | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 67% |
| 5591407 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 4.88 | 81% |
| awawa | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 5.25 | 88% |
| ? | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.13 | 52% |
| aafat | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 5.13 | 85% |
| avg | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 3.97 | 66% |
| median | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 4.25 | 71% |
Final exam
| pseudonym | 1.1 (intro) | 1.2 (brep) | 2.2 (dtvd3d) | 3.1 (voxels) | 3.2 (iso19107) | 4.1 (matgmaps) | 4.2 (3dcm) | 5.1 (curves) | 5.2 (csg) | 6.2 (bim) | total | total (%) |
| i_am_groot | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 1.83 | 18% |
| mypseudonym | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 9.00 | 90% |
| ??? | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 8.75 | 88% |
| NURBS? | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.00 | 100% |
| Marcel-Purcel | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.75 | 98% |
| ??? | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.75 | 98% |
| stinger | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.75 | 98% |
| Brim | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 7.00 | 70% |
| sweet potato | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 7.75 | 78% |
| Mark | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 8.00 | 80% |
| zoo | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 6.75 | 68% |
| powerplant | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 8.50 | 85% |
| polarbear | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 5.25 | 53% |
| Zenin | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 5.25 | 53% |
| Blueprint | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 7.50 | 75% |
| awawa | 0.67 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 7.67 | 77% |
| ??? | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.25 | 7.88 | 79% |
| Karim | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 7.75 | 78% |
| aafat | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.00 | 90% |
| Paratrus | 0.92 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 8.17 | 82% |
| 666B6E617574697374 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 6.33 | 63% |
| Azem | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 8.25 | 83% |
| ??? | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 8.75 | 88% |
| Goose17 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 8.00 | 80% |
| 5591407 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 8.42 | 84% |
| tacomonster | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 7.50 | 75% |
| I am 3d | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 7.38 | 74% |
| avg | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 7.77 | 78% |
| median | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 8.00 | 80% |