Marks
Overall
| pseudonym | hw1 | hw2 | hw3 | midterm | final exam | exams avg | total | rounded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| _f16 | 100% | 63% | 65% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 54% | 5 |
| ??? | 50% | 55% | 29% | 40% | 38% | 35% | 3.5 | |
| abc1234 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 57% | 72% | 71% | 57% | 6 |
| berlin18 | 100% | 95% | 90% | 21% | 52% | 49% | 72% | 7 |
| Bomboclat | 100% | 85% | 85% | 64% | 77% | 76% | 82% | 8 |
| bottle | 100% | 85% | 85% | 39% | 74% | 71% | 79% | 8 |
| cedar | 100% | 78% | 100% | 50% | 5% | 48% | 5 | |
| CocoGoNuts | 100% | 45% | 70% | 39% | 40% | 40% | 53% | 5 |
| cola | 100% | 55% | 32% | 37% | 36% | 39% | 4 | |
| Dionysus | 100% | 85% | 85% | 25% | 60% | 56% | 72% | 7 |
| dz | 100% | 93% | 100% | 68% | 85% | 84% | 90% | 9 |
| Frodo | 63% | 65% | 21% | 54% | 51% | 51% | 5 | |
| Ganbusier | 100% | 78% | 100% | 50% | 77% | 74% | 83% | 8.5 |
| geit | 60% | 45% | 70% | 46% | 53% | 52% | 55% | 6 |
| hodo | 100% | 90% | 80% | 75% | 83% | 82% | 85% | 8.5 |
| Ihatekiwi | 100% | 95% | 70% | 50% | 51% | 51% | 69% | 7 |
| kawa1 | 100% | 78% | 100% | 57% | 74% | 73% | 82% | 8 |
| Krobus | 100% | 90% | 95% | 75% | 73% | 73% | 84% | 8.5 |
| kur0 | 100% | 93% | 100% | 50% | 71% | 69% | 83% | 8.5 |
| Maleficent | 100% | 45% | 90% | 62% | 56% | 65% | 6.5 | |
| Nayru | 100% | 83% | 100% | 86% | 88% | 87% | 90% | 9 |
| Nzt7 | 100% | 83% | 100% | 54% | 78% | 76% | 84% | 8.5 |
| OAO | 100% | 83% | 100% | 29% | 69% | 65% | 79% | 8 |
| oldest_student_31 | 60% | 80% | 32% | 76% | 72% | 64% | 6.5 | |
| peet | 100% | 45% | 36% | 4% | 21% | 2 | ||
| PickleRick | 100% | 63% | 65% | 29% | 73% | 68% | 70% | 7 |
| pitaya | 100% | 55% | 39% | 51% | 50% | 46% | 4.5 | |
| smira | 0% | 0% | 0 | |||||
| Soesje | 100% | 95% | 95% | 29% | 67% | 63% | 79% | 8 |
| spre vară | 100% | 0% | 10% | 1 | ||||
| Squared_circle | 90% | 95% | 90% | 25% | 3% | 47% | 4.5 | |
| St | 100% | 90% | 80% | 50% | 58% | 57% | 72% | 7 |
| Tadej Pogacar | 100% | 95% | 95% | 68% | 88% | 86% | 91% | 9 |
| what? | 100% | 93% | 100% | 46% | 69% | 67% | 82% | 8 |
| whtpbls | 100% | 90% | 80% | 36% | 66% | 63% | 75% | 7.5 |
| avg | 96% | 76% | 85% | 45% | 65% | 54% | 64% | 6.41 |
| median | 100% | 83% | 90% | 43% | 69% | 63% | 72% | 7.00 |
Homework 1
| pseudonym | code runs (2) | output (4) | report (4) | penalties | total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| _f16 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| ??? | 2 | 1 | 2 | 50% | |
| abc1234 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 60% | |
| berlin18 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Bomboclat | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| bottle | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| cedar | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| CocoGoNuts | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| cola | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Dionysus | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| dz | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Ganbusier | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| geit | 2 | 2 | 2 | 60% | |
| hodo | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Ihatekiwi | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| kawa1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Krobus | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| kur0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Maleficent | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Nayru | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Nzt7 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| OAO | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| oldest_student_31 | 0% | ||||
| peet | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| PickleRick | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| pitaya | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Soesje | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| spre vară | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Squared_circle | 2 | 4 | 3 | 90% | |
| St | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Tadej Pogacar | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| what? | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| whtpbls | 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| avg | 2.00 | 3.75 | 3.81 | 92.73% | |
| median | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 100.00% |
Homework 2
| pseudonym | Report (3) | code runs (1) | schema-valid (1) | LoD0.2 (2) | LoD1.2 (3) | penalties | total | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| _f16 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 62.5% | LoD1.2 often too high, 70% not applied correctly. BK is to top of the tower! ++ specialcase_2 has wrong inner ring, bowtie ++ specialcase_3 crashes? ++ Report is a bit difficult to read, you mix theory and functions (which I don’t know) and I got lost. My advice is to write only in theory (with figures) and then maybe refer to functions (but even this is not that relevant, we want to know how your solved the issue conceptually) | |
| ??? | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 55% | Semantics used, building w/o semantics segfault ++ flat.json/specialcase_3/etc lod1.2 and lod0.2 are empty? ++ report has no real cases that could fail, just very zoomed-out models where I can’t really see what is happening | |
| abc1234 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 45% | segfault with many of the input (simple.city.json) ++ report is informative ++ lod0.2 is set at the lowest vertex, see otb.json with the wrong façade… ++ lod1.2 missing in most files | |
| berlin18 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 95% | Buildings with 2+ BuildingParts crash ++ rest everything is perfect, LoD1.2 height is really nicely obtained for all cases 👍 ++ report is clear and informative | |
| Bomboclat | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 85% | Crash is no semantics!?! While report states otherwise (file simple_no_sem.city.json segfault) — 70% rule works — LoD1.2 Solid has e102 — crash bk.json because of bad geom + clear report that contains everything | |
| bottle | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 85% | Crash is no semantics!?! While report states otherwise (file simple_no_sem.city.json segfault) — 70% rule works — LoD1.2 Solid has e102 — crash bk.json because of bad geom + clear report that contains everything | |
| cedar | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 77.5% | Inner ring/yards not considered (specialcase_2/lyon) for lod1.2 (but lod0.2 is fine?) ++ specialcase_3.city.json no schema valid ++ confusing rule for ground: if no surface has both those criteria then what? ++ | |
| CocoGoNuts | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 45% | cmake was wrong, wrong project() ++ error compilation l.451 should be double ++ LoD1.2 too low for simple.json ++ no LoD1.2 for flat.json ++ LoD1.2 for otb.json is one surface ++ LoD0.2 is also often missing? ++ holes in footprints works fine (specialcase_2) ++ specialcase_3 segfault | |
| cola | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 55% | Semantics used, building w/o semantics segfault ++ flat.json/specialcase_3/etc lod1.2 and lod0.2 are empty? ++ report has no real cases that could fail, just very zoomed-out models where I can’t really see what is happening | |
| Dionysus | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 85% | Crash is no semantics!?! While report states otherwise (file simple_no_sem.city.json segfault) — 70% rule works — LoD1.2 Solid has e102 — crash bk.json because of bad geom + clear report that contains everything | |
| dz | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 92.5% | Schema not valid for specialcase_3: “geometry” is missing for the Building. The rest is 👍 (and I don’t know why under macOS I get that error, will try to find out) | |
| Frodo | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 62.5% | LoD1.2 often too high, 70% not applied correctly. BK is to top of the tower! ++ specialcase_2 has wrong inner ring, bowtie ++ specialcase_3 crashes? ++ Report is a bit difficult to read, you mix theory and functions (which I don’t know) and I got lost. My advice is to write only in theory (with figures) and then maybe refer to functions (but even this is not that relevant, we want to know how your solved the issue conceptually) | |
| Ganbusier | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 77.5% | Inner ring/yards not considered (specialcase_2/lyon) for lod1.2 (but lod0.2 is fine?) ++ specialcase_3.city.json no schema valid ++ confusing rule for ground: if no surface has both those criteria then what? ++ | |
| geit | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 45% | cmake was wrong, wrong project() ++ error compilation l.451 should be double ++ LoD1.2 too low for simple.json ++ no LoD1.2 for flat.json ++ LoD1.2 for otb.json is one surface ++ LoD0.2 is also often missing? ++ holes in footprints works fine (specialcase_2) ++ specialcase_3 segfault | |
| hodo | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 90% | MultiSurfaces not handled?! ++ rest is perfect 👍 | |
| Ihatekiwi | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 95% | All good results, everything valid 👍 Report could have contained a bit more special cases examples, but it’s also pretty good | |
| kawa1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 77.5% | Inner ring/yards not considered (specialcase_2/lyon) for lod1.2 (but lod0.2 is fine?) ++ specialcase_3.city.json no schema valid ++ confusing rule for ground: if no surface has both those criteria then what? ++ | |
| Krobus | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 90% | No processing of LoD=2? ++ File out written where? Had to modify ++ only reads Solids? ++ fantastic report ❤️ | |
| kur0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 92.5% | Schema not valid for specialcase_3: “geometry” is missing for the Building. The rest is 👍 (and I don’t know why under macOS I get that error, will try to find out) | |
| Maleficent | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 45% | ||
| Nayru | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 82.5% | LoD1.2 for simple.json is ridge, for bk it’s eave (70% doesn’t work). Rest is all good and valid 👍 For report, not super clear how the 70% rule would be used, which is visible with the simple tests we made | |
| Nzt7 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 82.5% | LoD1.2 for simple.json is ridge, for bk it’s eave (70% doesn’t work). Rest is all good and valid 👍 For report, not super clear how the 70% rule would be used, which is visible with the simple tests we made | |
| OAO | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 82.5% | LoD1.2 for simple.json is ridge, for bk it’s eave (70% doesn’t work). Rest is all good and valid 👍 For report, not super clear how the 70% rule would be used, which is visible with the simple tests we made | |
| oldest_student_31 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 45% | segfault with many of the input (simple.city.json) ++ report is informative ++ lod0.2 is set at the lowest vertex, see otb.json with the wrong façade… ++ lod1.2 missing in most files | |
| peet | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 45% | cmake was wrong, wrong project() ++ error compilation l.451 should be double ++ LoD1.2 too low for simple.json ++ no LoD1.2 for flat.json ++ LoD1.2 for otb.json is one surface ++ LoD0.2 is also often missing? ++ holes in footprints works fine (specialcase_2) ++ specialcase_3 segfault | |
| PickleRick | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 62.5% | LoD1.2 often too high, 70% not applied correctly. BK is to top of the tower! ++ specialcase_2 has wrong inner ring, bowtie ++ specialcase_3 crashes? ++ Report is a bit difficult to read, you mix theory and functions (which I don’t know) and I got lost. My advice is to write only in theory (with figures) and then maybe refer to functions (but even this is not that relevant, we want to know how your solved the issue conceptually) | |
| pitaya | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 55% | Semantics used, building w/o semantics segfault ++ flat.json/specialcase_3/etc lod1.2 and lod0.2 are empty? ++ report has no real cases that could fail, just very zoomed-out models where I can’t really see what is happening | |
| Soesje | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 95% | Buildings with 2+ BuildingParts crash ++ rest everything is perfect, LoD1.2 height is really nicely obtained for all cases 👍 ++ report is clear and informative | |
| spre vară | 0% | |||||||
| Squared_circle | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 95% | Buildings with 2+ BuildingParts crash ++ rest everything is perfect, LoD1.2 height is really nicely obtained for all cases 👍 ++ report is clear and informative | |
| St | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 90% | MultiSurfaces not handled?! ++ rest is perfect 👍 | |
| Tadej Pogacar | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 95% | All good results, everything valid 👍 Report could have contained a bit more special cases examples, but it’s also pretty good | |
| what? | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 92.5% | Schema not valid for specialcase_3: “geometry” is missing for the Building. The rest is 👍 (and I don’t know why under macOS I get that error, will try to find out) | |
| whtpbls | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 90% | MultiSurfaces not handled?! ++ rest is perfect 👍 | |
| avg | 2.33 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 1.61 | 2.01 | 73% | ||
| median | 2.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 82.50% |
Homework 3
| pseudonym 1 | pseudonym 2 | pseudonym 3 | pseudonym 4 | followed all rules (1) | quality of results (5) | quality of report (4) | penalties | total | notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kawa1 | Ganbusier | cedar | 1 | 5 | 4 | 100% | Excellent result, detailed report, good critical analysis | ||
| bottle | Dionysus | Bomboclat | 1 | 4 | 3.5 | 85% | Nice creative way to do filtering, good results and good report. Just missed validation of results, some extra rooms between stories. | ||
| hodo | whtpbls | St | oldest_student_31 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 80% | Decent result with semantic surfaces, report okay. Rooms in CityJSON often not really rooms and do not form closed surfaces. Missed more discussion of issues / validation of output. | |
| Tadej Pogacar | Krobus | 1 | 5 | 3.5 | 95% | Excellent result, good report but lacked a bit of analysis of results | |||
| what? | kur0 | dz | 1 | 5 | 4 | 100% | Excellent result with semantics, detailed report, comprehensive analysis of issues | ||
| OAO | Nayru | Nzt7 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 100% | Excellent result (small issues with rooms between stories but very good semantics), report very detailed with nice description of algorithms and discussion of issues. | ||
| Soesje | 1 | 5 | 3.5 | 95% | Excellent result, just missed some more analysis/validation of results in report | ||||
| abc1234 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 20% | Just the very beginning of the assignment | ||||
| berlin18 | Squared_circle | Maleficent | 1 | 5 | 3 | 90% | Building geom stored as building room but excellent result otherwise, good analysis of results although figuring out the reason behind validation error would have been nice | ||
| PickleRick | Frodo | _f16 | 1 | 3 | 2.5 | 65% | Intermediate results in report look quite good but final CityJSON pretty much broken, report mostly good including nice videos but falls off towards end, no insight into why final result failed. | ||
| CocoGoNuts | geit | Ihatekiwi | 1 | 3 | 3 | 70% | Okay result only on IfcOpenHouse, report thorough on methodology but lacking analysis/validation of results, not clear if more complex model was attempted or what failed | ||
| avg | 1.00 | 4.00 | 3.18 | 82% | |||||
| median | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.50 | 90% |
Midterm
| pseudonym | 1.1 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 4.1 | total | total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| _f16 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 2.50 | 36% |
| ??? | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 29% |
| abc1234 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 4.00 | 57% |
| berlin18 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 21% |
| Bomboclat | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 4.50 | 64% |
| bottle | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 2.75 | 39% |
| cedar | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 50% |
| CocoGoNuts | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 2.75 | 39% |
| cola | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 32% |
| Dionysus | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 25% |
| dz | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 4.75 | 68% |
| Frodo | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 21% |
| Ganbusier | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 3.50 | 50% |
| geit | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 3.25 | 46% |
| hodo | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 5.25 | 75% |
| Ihatekiwi | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 50% |
| kawa1 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 4.00 | 57% |
| Krobus | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 5.25 | 75% |
| kur0 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 3.50 | 50% |
| Nayru | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 6.00 | 86% |
| Nzt7 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 3.75 | 54% |
| OAO | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 2.00 | 29% |
| oldest_student_31 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 32% |
| peet | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 2.50 | 36% |
| PickleRick | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 29% |
| pitaya | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 2.75 | 39% |
| Soesje | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 29% |
| Squared_circle | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.75 | 25% |
| St | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 3.50 | 50% |
| Tadej Pogacar | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 4.75 | 68% |
| what? | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.25 | 46% |
| whtpbls | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 2.50 | 36% |
| avg | 0.65 | 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 3.16 | 45% |
| median | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 3.00 | 43% |
Final exam
| pseudonym | 1.1 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 6.1 | 6.2 | total | total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nayru | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.50 | 88% |
| PickleRick | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 8.75 | 73% |
| what? | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 8.25 | 69% |
| cola | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 4.42 | 37% |
| Soesje | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 8.00 | 67% |
| geit | 0.33 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 6.33 | 53% |
| abc1234 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 8.67 | 72% |
| bottle | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 8.92 | 74% |
| Krobus | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 8.75 | 73% |
| kawa1 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 8.92 | 74% |
| ??? | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 4.75 | 40% |
| CocoGoNuts | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 4.75 | 40% |
| dz | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 10.25 | 85% |
| Dionysus | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 7.17 | 60% |
| Ihatekiwi | 0.67 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 6.17 | 51% |
| _f16 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 4.33 | 36% |
| Tadej Pogacar | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 10.50 | 88% |
| kur0 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 8.50 | 71% |
| Ganbusier | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 9.25 | 77% |
| Frodo | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 6.50 | 54% |
| OAO | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 8.25 | 69% |
| Maleficent | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 7.42 | 62% |
| berlin18 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 6.25 | 52% |
| hodo | 0.67 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.92 | 83% |
| St | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 6.92 | 58% |
| whtpbls | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 7.92 | 66% |
| pitaya | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 6.17 | 51% |
| Nzt7 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 9.42 | 78% |
| Bomboclat | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.25 | 77% |
| oldest_student_31 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 9.17 | 76% |
| avg | 0.82 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.84 | 0.31 | 0.96 | 0.68 | 0.48 | 7.81 | 65% |
| median | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.50 | 8.25 | 69% |