Marks

Marks
- Overall
- Homework 1
- Homework 2
- Homework 3
- Midterm
- Final exam
- Resit exam

Overall

Show entries

Search:

pseudonym	hw1	hw2	hw3	midterm	final exam	exams avg	total	rounded
???	50%	55%		29%	40%	38%	35%	3.5
_f16	100%	63%	65%			60%	66%	6.5
abc1234	60%	60%	20%	57%	72%	71%	57%	6
berlin18	100%	95%	90%	21%	52%	49%	72%	7
Bomboclat	100%	85%	85%	64%	77%	76%	82%	8
bottle	100%	85%	85%	39%	74%	71%	79%	8
cedar	100%	78%	100%	50%	82%	79%	85%	8.5
CocoGoNuts	100%	40%	70%			65%	64%	6.5
cola	100%	55%	55%			54%	59%	6
Dionysus	100%	85%	85%	25%	60%	56%	72%	7
dz	100%	93%	100%	68%	85%	84%	90%	9
Frodo	100%	63%	65%	21%	54%	51%	61%	6
Ganbusier	100%	78%	100%	50%	77%	74%	83%	8.5
geit	60%	45%	70%	46%	53%	52%	55%	6
hodo	100%	90%	80%	75%	83%	82%	85%	8.5
Ihatekiwi	100%	95%	70%	50%	51%	51%	69%	7
kawa1	100%	78%	100%	57%	74%	73%	82%	8
Krobus	100%	90%	95%	75%	73%	73%	84%	8.5
kur0	100%	93%	100%	50%	71%	69%	83%	8.5
Maleficent	100%	45%	90%		62%	56%	65%	6.5
Nayru	100%	83%	100%	86%	88%	87%	90%	9
Nzt7	100%	83%	100%	54%	78%	76%	84%	8.5
OAO	100%	83%	100%	29%	69%	65%	79%	8
oldest_student_31	40%	60%	80%	32%	76%	72%	68%
peet	100%	45%		36%		4%	21%	2
PickleRick	100%	63%	65%	29%	73%	68%	70%	7
pitaya	100%	55%	55%			56%	60%	6
smira						0%	0%	0
Soesje	100%	95%	95%	29%	67%	63%	79%	8
spre vară	100%					0%	10%	1
Squared_circle	90%	95%	90%			67%	79%	8
St	100%	90%	80%	50%	58%	57%	72%	7
Tadej Pogacar	100%	95%	95%	68%	88%	86%	91%	9
what?	100%	93%	100%	46%	69%	67%	82%	8
whtpbls	100%	90%	80%	36%	66%	63%	75%	7.5
avg	94%	76%	83%	47%	69%	60%	68%	6.84
median	100%	83%	85%	50%	72%	65%	72%	7.25

Showing 1 to 35 of 35 entries

Homework 1

Show entries

Search:

pseudonym	code runs (2)	output (4)	report (4)	total
???	2	1	2	50%
_f16	2	4	4	100%
abc1234	2	1	3	60%
berlin18	2	4	4	100%
Bomboclat	2	4	4	100%
bottle	2	4	4	100%
cedar	2	4	4	100%
CocoGoNuts	2	4	4	100%
cola	2	4	4	100%
Dionysus	2	4	4	100%
dz	2	4	4	100%
Ganbusier	2	4	4	100%
geit	2	2	2	60%
hodo	2	4	4	100%
Ihatekiwi	2	4	4	100%
kawa1	2	4	4	100%
Krobus	2	4	4	100%
kur0	2	4	4	100%
Maleficent	2	4	4	100%
Nayru	2	4	4	100%
Nzt7	2	4	4	100%
OAO	2	4	4	100%
oldest_student_31				0%
peet	2	4	4	100%
PickleRick	2	4	4	100%
pitaya	2	4	4	100%
Soesje	2	4	4	100%
spre vară	2	4	4	100%
Squared_circle	2	4	3	90%
St	2	4	4	100%
Tadej Pogacar	2	4	4	100%
what?	2	4	4	100%
whtpbls	2	4	4	100%
avg	2.00	3.75	3.81	92.73%
median	2.00	4.00	4.00	100.00%

Showing 1 to 33 of 33 entries

Homework 2

Show entries

Search:

pseudonym	Report (3)	code runs (1)	schema-valid (1)	LoD0.2 (2)	LoD1.2 (3)	total	Notes
???	2.0	1.0	1.0	0.5	1.0	55%	Semantics used, building w/o semantics segfault ++ flat.json/specialcase_3/etc lod1.2 and lod0.2 are empty? ++ report has no real cases that could fail, just very zoomed-out models where I can’t really see what is happening
_f16	1.5	0.8	1.0	1.5	1.5	62.5%	LoD1.2 often too high, 70% not applied correctly. BK is to top of the tower! ++ specialcase_2 has wrong inner ring, bowtie ++ specialcase_3 crashes? ++ Report is a bit difficult to read, you mix theory and functions (which I don’t know) and I got lost. My advice is to write only in theory (with figures) and then maybe refer to functions (but even this is not that relevant, we want to know how your solved the issue conceptually)
abc1234	2.0	1.0	1.0	0.5	0.0	45%	segfault with many of the input (simple.city.json) ++ report is informative ++ lod0.2 is set at the lowest vertex, see otb.json with the wrong façade… ++ lod1.2 missing in most files
berlin18	3.0	0.5	1.0	2.0	3.0	95%	Buildings with 2+ BuildingParts crash ++ rest everything is perfect, LoD1.2 height is really nicely obtained for all cases 👍 ++ report is clear and informative
Bomboclat	3.0	0.5	1.0	2.0	2.0	85%	Crash is no semantics!?! While report states otherwise (file simple_no_sem.city.json segfault) — 70% rule works — LoD1.2 Solid has e102 — crash bk.json because of bad geom + clear report that contains everything
bottle	3.0	0.5	1.0	2.0	2.0	85%	Crash is no semantics!?! While report states otherwise (file simple_no_sem.city.json segfault) — 70% rule works — LoD1.2 Solid has e102 — crash bk.json because of bad geom + clear report that contains everything
cedar	2.0	1.0	0.8	2.0	2.0	77.5%	Inner ring/yards not considered (specialcase_2/lyon) for lod1.2 (but lod0.2 is fine?) ++ specialcase_3.city.json no schema valid ++ confusing rule for ground: if no surface has both those criteria then what? ++
CocoGoNuts	2.0	0.5	0.0	1.0	1.0	45%	cmake was wrong, wrong project() ++ error compilation l.451 should be double ++ LoD1.2 too low for simple.json ++ no LoD1.2 for flat.json ++ LoD1.2 for otb.json is one surface ++ LoD0.2 is also often missing? ++ holes in footprints works fine (specialcase_2) ++ specialcase_3 segfault
cola	2.0	1.0	1.0	0.5	1.0	55%	Semantics used, building w/o semantics segfault ++ flat.json/specialcase_3/etc lod1.2 and lod0.2 are empty? ++ report has no real cases that could fail, just very zoomed-out models where I can’t really see what is happening
Dionysus	3.0	0.5	1.0	2.0	2.0	85%	Crash is no semantics!?! While report states otherwise (file simple_no_sem.city.json segfault) — 70% rule works — LoD1.2 Solid has e102 — crash bk.json because of bad geom + clear report that contains everything
dz	2.5	1.0	0.8	2.0	3.0	92.5%	Schema not valid for specialcase_3: “geometry” is missing for the Building. The rest is 👍 (and I don’t know why under macOS I get that error, will try to find out)
Frodo	1.5	0.8	1.0	1.5	1.5	62.5%	LoD1.2 often too high, 70% not applied correctly. BK is to top of the tower! ++ specialcase_2 has wrong inner ring, bowtie ++ specialcase_3 crashes? ++ Report is a bit difficult to read, you mix theory and functions (which I don’t know) and I got lost. My advice is to write only in theory (with figures) and then maybe refer to functions (but even this is not that relevant, we want to know how your solved the issue conceptually)
Ganbusier	2.0	1.0	0.8	2.0	2.0	77.5%	Inner ring/yards not considered (specialcase_2/lyon) for lod1.2 (but lod0.2 is fine?) ++ specialcase_3.city.json no schema valid ++ confusing rule for ground: if no surface has both those criteria then what? ++
geit	2.0	0.5	0.0	1.0	1.0	45%	cmake was wrong, wrong project() ++ error compilation l.451 should be double ++ LoD1.2 too low for simple.json ++ no LoD1.2 for flat.json ++ LoD1.2 for otb.json is one surface ++ LoD0.2 is also often missing? ++ holes in footprints works fine (specialcase_2) ++ specialcase_3 segfault
hodo	3.0	0.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	90%	MultiSurfaces not handled?! ++ rest is perfect 👍
Ihatekiwi	2.5	1.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	95%	All good results, everything valid 👍 Report could have contained a bit more special cases examples, but it’s also pretty good
kawa1	2.0	1.0	0.8	2.0	2.0	77.5%	Inner ring/yards not considered (specialcase_2/lyon) for lod1.2 (but lod0.2 is fine?) ++ specialcase_3.city.json no schema valid ++ confusing rule for ground: if no surface has both those criteria then what? ++
Krobus	3.0	0.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	90%	No processing of LoD=2? ++ File out written where? Had to modify ++ only reads Solids? ++ fantastic report ❤️
kur0	2.5	1.0	0.8	2.0	3.0	92.5%	Schema not valid for specialcase_3: “geometry” is missing for the Building. The rest is 👍 (and I don’t know why under macOS I get that error, will try to find out)
Maleficent	2.0	0.5	0.0	1.0	1.0	45%
Nayru	2.0	1.0	1.0	2.0	2.3	82.5%	LoD1.2 for simple.json is ridge, for bk it’s eave (70% doesn’t work). Rest is all good and valid 👍 For report, not super clear how the 70% rule would be used, which is visible with the simple tests we made
Nzt7	2.0	1.0	1.0	2.0	2.3	82.5%	LoD1.2 for simple.json is ridge, for bk it’s eave (70% doesn’t work). Rest is all good and valid 👍 For report, not super clear how the 70% rule would be used, which is visible with the simple tests we made
OAO	2.0	1.0	1.0	2.0	2.3	82.5%	LoD1.2 for simple.json is ridge, for bk it’s eave (70% doesn’t work). Rest is all good and valid 👍 For report, not super clear how the 70% rule would be used, which is visible with the simple tests we made
oldest_student_31	2.0	1.0	1.0	0.5	0.0	45%	segfault with many of the input (simple.city.json) ++ report is informative ++ lod0.2 is set at the lowest vertex, see otb.json with the wrong façade… ++ lod1.2 missing in most files
peet	2.0	0.5	0.0	1.0	1.0	45%	cmake was wrong, wrong project() ++ error compilation l.451 should be double ++ LoD1.2 too low for simple.json ++ no LoD1.2 for flat.json ++ LoD1.2 for otb.json is one surface ++ LoD0.2 is also often missing? ++ holes in footprints works fine (specialcase_2) ++ specialcase_3 segfault
PickleRick	1.5	0.8	1.0	1.5	1.5	62.5%	LoD1.2 often too high, 70% not applied correctly. BK is to top of the tower! ++ specialcase_2 has wrong inner ring, bowtie ++ specialcase_3 crashes? ++ Report is a bit difficult to read, you mix theory and functions (which I don’t know) and I got lost. My advice is to write only in theory (with figures) and then maybe refer to functions (but even this is not that relevant, we want to know how your solved the issue conceptually)
pitaya	2.0	1.0	1.0	0.5	1.0	55%	Semantics used, building w/o semantics segfault ++ flat.json/specialcase_3/etc lod1.2 and lod0.2 are empty? ++ report has no real cases that could fail, just very zoomed-out models where I can’t really see what is happening
Soesje	3.0	0.5	1.0	2.0	3.0	95%	Buildings with 2+ BuildingParts crash ++ rest everything is perfect, LoD1.2 height is really nicely obtained for all cases 👍 ++ report is clear and informative
spre vară						0%
Squared_circle	3.0	0.5	1.0	2.0	3.0	95%	Buildings with 2+ BuildingParts crash ++ rest everything is perfect, LoD1.2 height is really nicely obtained for all cases 👍 ++ report is clear and informative
St	3.0	0.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	90%	MultiSurfaces not handled?! ++ rest is perfect 👍
Tadej Pogacar	2.5	1.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	95%	All good results, everything valid 👍 Report could have contained a bit more special cases examples, but it’s also pretty good
what?	2.5	1.0	0.8	2.0	3.0	92.5%	Schema not valid for specialcase_3: “geometry” is missing for the Building. The rest is 👍 (and I don’t know why under macOS I get that error, will try to find out)
whtpbls	3.0	0.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	90%	MultiSurfaces not handled?! ++ rest is perfect 👍
avg	2.33	0.70	0.83	1.61	2.01	73%
median	2.00	0.75	1.00	2.00	2.00	82.50%

Showing 1 to 34 of 34 entries

Homework 3

Show entries

Search:

pseudonym 1	pseudonym 2	pseudonym 3	pseudonym 4	followed all rules (1)	quality of results (5)	quality of report (4)	total	notes
abc1234				1	0	1	20%	Just the very beginning of the assignment
berlin18	Squared_circle	Maleficent		1	5	3	90%	Building geom stored as building room but excellent result otherwise, good analysis of results although figuring out the reason behind validation error would have been nice
bottle	Dionysus	Bomboclat		1	4	3.5	85%	Nice creative way to do filtering, good results and good report. Just missed validation of results, some extra rooms between stories.
CocoGoNuts	geit	Ihatekiwi		1	3	3	70%	Okay result only on IfcOpenHouse, report thorough on methodology but lacking analysis/validation of results, not clear if more complex model was attempted or what failed
hodo	whtpbls	St	oldest_student_31	1	4	3	80%	Decent result with semantic surfaces, report okay. Rooms in CityJSON often not really rooms and do not form closed surfaces. Missed more discussion of issues / validation of output.
kawa1	Ganbusier	cedar		1	5	4	100%	Excellent result, detailed report, good critical analysis
OAO	Nayru	Nzt7		1	5	4	100%	Excellent result (small issues with rooms between stories but very good semantics), report very detailed with nice description of algorithms and discussion of issues.
PickleRick	Frodo	_f16		1	3	2.5	65%	Intermediate results in report look quite good but final CityJSON pretty much broken, report mostly good including nice videos but falls off towards end, no insight into why final result failed.
Soesje				1	5	3.5	95%	Excellent result, just missed some more analysis/validation of results in report
Tadej Pogacar	Krobus			1	5	3.5	95%	Excellent result, good report but lacked a bit of analysis of results
what?	kur0	dz		1	5	4	100%	Excellent result with semantics, detailed report, comprehensive analysis of issues
			avg	1.00	4.00	3.18	82%
			median	1.00	5.00	3.50	90%

Showing 1 to 11 of 11 entries

Midterm

Exam questions

Show entries

Search:

pseudonym	1.1	1.2	2.1	2.2	3.1	3.2	4.1	total	total (%)
???	0.00	0.00	0.50	0.75	0.00	0.75	0.00	2.00	29%
_f16	1.00	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.00	0.25	0.25	2.50	36%
abc1234	1.00	0.00	1.00	0.00	0.75	1.00	0.25	4.00	57%
berlin18	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.00	1.50	21%
Bomboclat	0.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.75	4.50	64%
bottle	0.00	0.00	0.75	0.50	0.00	0.75	0.75	2.75	39%
cedar	1.00	0.25	0.75	0.00	0.75	0.75	0.00	3.50	50%
CocoGoNuts	1.00	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.75	0.50	2.75	39%
cola	0.50	0.25	0.25	0.75	0.00	0.50	0.00	2.25	32%
Dionysus	1.00	0.25	0.00	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.75	25%
dz	0.50	0.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	4.75	68%
Frodo	0.00	0.25	0.00	0.00	0.25	0.25	0.75	1.50	21%
Ganbusier	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.00	0.00	0.75	3.50	50%
geit	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.25	1.00	3.25	46%
hodo	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.25	0.50	1.00	0.75	5.25	75%
Ihatekiwi	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.75	0.50	0.75	0.50	3.50	50%
kawa1	1.00	0.00	0.25	0.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	4.00	57%
Krobus	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.25	0.50	0.75	5.25	75%
kur0	1.00	0.25	0.50	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.75	3.50	50%
Nayru	1.00	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	6.00	86%
Nzt7	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.75	3.75	54%
OAO	0.00	0.25	0.25	0.00	0.50	0.75	0.25	2.00	29%
oldest_student_31	1.00	0.00	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.75	0.00	2.25	32%
peet	1.00	0.00	0.25	0.00	0.00	0.50	0.75	2.50	36%
PickleRick	0.00	0.25	0.75	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.00	29%
pitaya	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.50	0.00	1.00	0.25	2.75	39%
Soesje	0.75	0.25	0.75	0.00	0.25	0.00	0.00	2.00	29%
Squared_circle	0.50	0.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.50	0.50	1.75	25%
St	0.00	0.75	0.25	0.75	0.75	0.25	0.75	3.50	50%
Tadej Pogacar	1.00	0.25	0.50	0.25	1.00	1.00	0.75	4.75	68%
what?	0.00	0.00	0.50	0.75	0.00	1.00	1.00	3.25	46%
whtpbls	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.25	0.00	0.25	2.50	36%
avg	0.65	0.30	0.44	0.37	0.30	0.60	0.50	3.16	45%
median	1.00	0.25	0.50	0.38	0.00	0.75	0.63	3.00	43%

Showing 1 to 32 of 32 entries

Final exam

Exam questions

Show entries

Search:

pseudonym	1.1	1.2	2.1	2.2	3.1	3.2	4.1	4.2	5.1	5.2	6.1	6.2	total	total (%)
???	1.00	0.50	0.25	0.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.25	0.00	1.00	0.50	0.25	4.75	40%
_f16	0.33	0.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.50	4.33	36%
abc1234	0.67	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.00	8.67	72%
berlin18	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	0.00	1.00	0.00	0.25	0.25	1.00	1.00	0.00	6.25	52%
Bomboclat	1.00	0.25	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.25	1.00	1.00	1.00	9.25	77%
bottle	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.67	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.00	0.50	8.92	74%
cedar	0.67	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.67	1.00	0.75	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.50	9.83	82%
CocoGoNuts	1.00	0.00	0.25	0.00	0.50	0.00	0.25	1.00	0.00	1.00	0.50	0.25	4.75	40%
cola	0.00	0.00	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.00	0.50	0.67	0.00	1.00	0.25	0.25	4.42	37%
Dionysus	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.50	0.67	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.50	7.17	60%
dz	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.50	10.25	85%
Frodo	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.00	1.00	0.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.25	0.25	6.50	54%
Ganbusier	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.50	9.25	77%
geit	0.33	1.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.50	0.00	1.00	0.25	0.50	6.33	53%
hodo	0.67	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	9.92	83%
Ihatekiwi	0.67	0.75	1.00	0.25	0.50	0.25	0.25	1.00	0.00	1.00	0.25	0.25	6.17	51%
kawa1	0.67	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	0.00	1.00	0.25	0.50	8.92	74%
Krobus	1.00	0.25	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.75	8.75	73%
kur0	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.25	1.00	0.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	8.50	71%
Maleficent	1.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	0.50	0.00	0.75	0.67	0.25	1.00	0.25	0.25	7.42	62%
Nayru	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	10.50	88%
Nzt7	0.67	0.75	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.50	9.42	78%
OAO	1.00	0.00	0.75	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.75	0.50	8.25	69%
oldest_student_31	0.67	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.25	1.00	1.00	0.75	9.17	76%
PickleRick	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.25	0.00	0.25	8.75	73%
pitaya	0.67	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.00	6.17	51%
Soesje	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.25	1.00	0.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	8.00	67%
St	0.67	0.75	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.25	0.50	1.00	0.25	1.00	0.25	0.00	6.92	58%
Tadej Pogacar	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	0.25	1.00	1.00	0.75	10.50	88%
what?	1.00	0.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.25	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	8.25	69%
whtpbls	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.67	0.25	1.00	0.75	0.25	7.92	66%
avg	0.81	0.65	0.77	0.74	0.61	0.54	0.47	0.84	0.32	0.96	0.69	0.48	7.88	66%
median	1.00	0.75	0.75	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	0.50	8.25	69%

Showing 1 to 31 of 31 entries

Resit exam

Show entries

Search:

pseudonym	1.1	1.2	2.1	2.2	3.1	3.2	4.1	4.2	5.1	5.2	6.1	6.2	total	total (%)
_f16	1.00	0.50	0.25	1.00	0.00	0.25	1.00	0.25	0.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	7.25	60%
CocoGoNuts	1.00	0.50	0.25	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.25	1.00	0.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	7.75	65%
cola	0.50	0.75	0.25	0.75	0.00	1.00	0.25	0.25	0.25	1.00	0.50	1.00	6.50	54%
pitaya	0.67	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.00	0.50	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	6.67	56%
Squared_circle	1.00	0.75	0.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.00	0.25	0.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	8.00	67%
avg	0.83	0.60	0.35	0.85	0.60	0.45	0.40	0.35	0.05	1.00	0.75	1.00	7.23	60%
median	1.00	0.50	0.25	1.00	1.00	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	7.25	60%

Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries